Uniswap vs. SushiSwap: Decentralized Exchange Battle

Cryptocurrency has come a long way since its inception, and with its growing popularity, a new world of decentralized finance (DeFi) has emerged. At the heart of this revolution lies the concept of decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which aim to offer users greater control over their assets and empower them with innovative financial products. In this article, we will take a deep dive into two of the most prominent DEXs in the market – Uniswap and SushiSwap. We will explore their features, advantages, disadvantages, and the impact they have had on the cryptocurrency ecosystem.


Decentralized exchanges are a relatively new phenomenon in the world of cryptocurrency, but they have quickly gained popularity due to their unique approach towards trading. Unlike centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Binance and Coinbase, which act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers, DEXs eliminate the need for a central authority. They utilize blockchain technology and smart contracts to facilitate peer-to-peer trading, giving users complete control over their funds.

Uniswap and SushiSwap are two of the most prominent DEXs in the market, both built on the Ethereum blockchain. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct differences that set them apart. Let’s take a closer look at each platform individually before comparing them head-to-head.

Overview of Uniswap

Uniswap vs. SushiSwap Decentralized Exchange Battle

Uniswap is a decentralized exchange protocol launched in 2018 by Hayden Adams. It became popular in 2020 during the DeFi boom, and it is currently the largest DEX in terms of trading volume. Uniswap is built on the Ethereum blockchain and utilizes an automated market maker (AMM) system, which uses pools of digital assets to facilitate trading. This means that users can trade without relying on a counterparty, making it highly decentralized.

Features of Uniswap

Uniswap is known for its simplicity, making it accessible to both experienced traders and newcomers. It uses an intuitive interface that allows users to easily swap one cryptocurrency for another in a matter of seconds. One of the main features of Uniswap is its ability to support trading of any ERC-20 token without requiring a listing process. This makes it an attractive platform for new and emerging projects looking to gain liquidity.

Another notable feature of Uniswap is its open-source nature, which allows anyone to create their own version of the exchange. This has led to the creation of various community-built extensions and integrations, making it a highly customizable platform.

Liquidity Provision on Uniswap

One of the key selling points of Uniswap is its unique approach to liquidity provision. Instead of relying on order books like traditional exchanges, Uniswap uses AMMs to determine prices based on the ratio of tokens in a liquidity pool. Anyone can become a liquidity provider by depositing an equal value of two tokens into a pool. In return, they receive liquidity provider (LP) tokens, which represent their share of the pool. LPs earn a percentage of transaction fees every time someone trades using the pool.

This system has attracted many users as it allows them to passively earn income by providing liquidity to the platform. However, it does come with some downsides. Since the price of a token in a pool is determined by its ratio to another token, high volatility can lead to impermanent losses for LPs. Impermanent losses occur when the value of the deposited tokens changes significantly, resulting in a reduction in the LP’s overall holdings.

Governance on Uniswap

Uniswap is a decentralized protocol, and as such, it relies on community governance to make decisions. UNI is the native governance token of Uniswap, giving holders the power to vote on proposals and changes to the protocol. This allows the community to have a say in the direction of the platform, making it truly decentralized.

Tokenomics of Uniswap

UNI was launched in September 2020 through an airdrop to users who had interacted with Uniswap before September 1st, 2020. The total supply of UNI is capped at 1 billion tokens, with 60% allocated to community members, 21.51% to team members and future employees, 17.80% to investors, and 0.69% to advisors. The remaining 5% will be distributed to the Uniswap treasury as a reserve fund.

Overview of SushiSwap

Uniswap vs. SushiSwap Decentralized Exchange Battle

SushiSwap is a DEX launched in 2020 by an anonymous founder known as “Chef Nomi.” It gained popularity as a fork of Uniswap, offering additional features and incentives for liquidity providers. However, it has since gone through major changes and is now a standalone platform. SushiSwap is built on the Ethereum blockchain and also uses an AMM system.

Features of SushiSwap

Like Uniswap, SushiSwap offers a simple user interface for trading various ERC-20 tokens. However, it also introduces some unique features, such as yield farming and staking. Yield farming is a process where users provide liquidity to the platform in return for rewards in the form of SUSHI tokens. These rewards are distributed according to the trading fees generated by the liquidity pool.

Another feature that sets SushiSwap apart is its focus on community involvement. Holders of SUSHI tokens can participate in community governance, similar to UNI holders. Additionally, SushiSwap has partnerships with other DeFi projects, allowing users to access a wider range of decentralized financial services through the platform.

Liquidity Provision on SushiSwap

SushiSwap follows a similar approach to Uniswap in terms of liquidity provision. However, it has introduced a unique concept known as “Onsen,” which offers incentives for LPs to provide liquidity to specific pools. These incentives are paid out in SUSHI tokens, making it an attractive option for users looking to earn more rewards.

Governance on SushiSwap

SushiSwap’s governance structure is similar to Uniswap, where SUSHI tokens give holders voting power on proposals and changes to the protocol. However, SushiSwap has faced some controversies regarding its governance, with Chef Nomi initially holding a large portion of the tokens and making decisions without community input. This led to a community uproar, and Chef Nomi eventually transferred control of the project to Sam Bankman-Fried, CEO of FTX exchange, who now leads the platform’s development.

Tokenomics of SushiSwap

SUSHI tokens were initially distributed through a liquidity mining program, where users could earn rewards by providing liquidity to SushiSwap. However, after the controversy surrounding Chef Nomi, the team behind SushiSwap announced that they would be moving towards a more traditional token distribution model. The total supply of SUSHI tokens is capped at 250 million, with 10% allocated to the development fund and 90% distributed to the community through various programs.

Comparison of Features

Both Uniswap and SushiSwap offer a simple user interface for trading cryptocurrencies. They also share features like yield farming, staking, and community governance. However, there are some notable differences between the two platforms.

One of the main differences is that Uniswap allows users to trade any ERC-20 token, making it a more inclusive platform. SushiSwap, on the other hand, has a more curated selection of tokens, with only those deemed “safe” by the community being listed. Additionally, SushiSwap offers higher rewards for liquidity providers, thanks to its Onsen program.

Uniswap’s open-source nature allows for more customization and community-built integrations, making it a more versatile platform. However, this also means that there is a higher risk of encountering scams or malicious forks. SushiSwap, on the other hand, has a more centralized approach, with decisions ultimately being made by the team and its partners. This can be seen as both an advantage and disadvantage, depending on personal preferences.

Liquidity Provision

One of the main advantages of both Uniswap and SushiSwap is their unique approach to liquidity provision. By allowing anyone to become an LP, these platforms have attracted a large number of users, resulting in high liquidity and trading volumes. However, both platforms also come with their own risks.

As mentioned earlier, Uniswap’s AMM system can result in impermanent losses for LPs during periods of high volatility. On the other hand, SushiSwap’s Onsen program offers higher rewards but also comes with the risk of impermanent losses due to its “liquidity mining” model.

Another point to consider is that while liquidity providers earn a percentage of transaction fees on both platforms, these fees tend to be higher on SushiSwap due to its curated selection of tokens. This is something to keep in mind when deciding where to provide liquidity.


Both Uniswap and SushiSwap are decentralized platforms, relying on community governance to make decisions. This gives power back to the users, making them active participants in the direction of the platforms. However, SushiSwap’s initial controversy surrounding its governance structure raises some questions about its future and whether it will continue to be truly decentralized.


The tokenomics of Uniswap and SushiSwap are quite different, with each platform taking a unique approach to distributing their native tokens. UNI was distributed through an airdrop to early users, while SUSHI tokens were initially distributed through a liquidity mining program. However, both platforms have since moved towards more traditional token distribution models.

One notable difference is the total supply of each token, with UNI having a much larger supply than SUSHI. This could potentially impact the price and value of each token in the long run.

User Experience

Both Uniswap and SushiSwap offer a user-friendly experience, making it easy for anyone to start trading cryptocurrencies. Uniswap’s simple interface allows users to swap one token for another quickly, while SushiSwap offers additional features like yield farming and staking. However, SushiSwap’s curated selection of tokens may be seen as a limitation by some users, especially those looking to trade lesser-known or emerging projects.

In terms of fees, both platforms charge a 0.3% trading fee, with an additional 0.25% going towards LP rewards on Uniswap and Onsen incentives on SushiSwap. These fees are relatively low compared to traditional exchanges, making DEXs more attractive to traders.


Security is a crucial factor when it comes to choosing a DEX, as users must trust the platform with their funds. Both Uniswap and SushiSwap have faced security breaches in the past, with Uniswap losing $300k in a hack in 2019, and SushiSwap experiencing a $14 million exploit in 2020. However, both platforms have since implemented measures to improve security, with Uniswap conducting an external audit and SushiSwap introducing a bug bounty program.


Uniswap and SushiSwap are two of the largest and most popular decentralized exchanges in the market today. While they share similarities, they also have distinct differences that set them apart. Uniswap’s open-source nature and inclusivity make it a versatile platform, while SushiSwap’s curated selection of tokens and incentives for liquidity providers make it an attractive option for earning rewards.

In terms of community governance, both platforms offer the power back to the users, although SushiSwap’s initial controversy raises some concerns. Tokenomics also differ, with UNI having a larger supply than SUSHI, which could impact the price and value of each token.

Ultimately, the choice between Uniswap and SushiSwap will depend on personal preferences and goals. However, one thing is certain – decentralized exchanges have opened up a world of possibilities for cryptocurrency traders and are here to stay in the ever-evolving landscape of DeFi.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *